|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
YES - for 6 long years the MOD denied veterans access to their medical records - "National Security" - gone missing - destroyed ete.,etc.; all the usual excuses to keep the truth hidden. When vets visited their GP's to ask for help concerning their peculiar "Gulf War Syndrome" disabilities they were asked - What were the vaccinations/tablets you were given - how much - how long - daily dose?, and so on and so forth Because the MOD was hiding and destroying this information the vets couldn't say - SO THE GP'S COULDN'T HELP THEM!. Do you think this concerned the Ministry? - not a bit of it, they were too busy trying to cover their backsides. As far as they were concerned that was the ONLY thing that mattered, the veterans were of NO ACCOUNT WHATSOEVER! and haven't been since. YES - our men also became polluted by SARIN - on a heavy numbers scale! Firstly the Iraqis used air burst sarin shells (despite the MOD denial). Secondly the Americans blew up a huge dump of unmarked enemy SARIN shells - so many it took over a week to finish the job. The 'fall-out" covered the entire Southern Iraqi desert killing every animal within 200 miles and beyond. Our troops had been ordered to return all anti-chemical warfare defensive equipment 10 DAYS BEFORE THIS HAPPENED! And the MOD informed Parliament that only ONE of our men might have been affected!!!! In their panic to stem the leakage of truthful information they had now entered the twilight zone of fanciful absurdity. YES - The word was then "put about" by the Ministry that the health problems suffered by the veterans (they had stopped calling them "malingerers" by this time) was the result of breathing the heavily polluted air caused by flaming oil wells. However, we have a letter on file from a British civilian resident in Kuwait City that said they had ALL suffered from the fumes - but had now recovered - and the only one's sick were those who'd had the vaccine injections and tablets! YES - We also have on file various replies from the MOD to charges we had made against them. Many of them state "We have seen no evidence" - indeed the Foreign Minister used exactly the same ploy in the House this week whilst trying to extricate himself from the Sierra Leone debacle. Let us make one thing perfectly clear "We have seen no evidence" - "I have seen no evidence", coming as it does from sources besotted with guilt for the most tremendous crimes of incompetence and irresponsibility means absolutely NOTHING!. They are merely filling the air with words - OF COURSE they have seen no evidence - it's the LAST thing they intend to see or to admit to - do you think for one moment they have LOOKED for it?. You may be quite certain they have combed through their offices and beyond to ensure no records, logs, faxes, signals or correspondence Ect., exists which could be remotely construed as establishing evidence of their shortcomings. Indeed it would be far nearer the mark to make a mental note that, whenever you hear the riposte of "We have seen no evidence" - "I have seen no evidence" - "There is no evidence", you can be absolutely certain you're dealing with connivers, dissemblers and procrastinators who wouldn't recognise truth and clarity if it stood up and hit them. Remember always that authorities who ply their trade behind the false barriers of NO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT are guilty of fraud and corruption not only as a matter of fact but also by inclination. To them TRUTH is a highly dangerous commodity to be hidden away behind expostulated 'Honour" and "Ethics". It is worth noting that ANY profession that prates its ethics is full of crooks! In the "BBC" HORIZON programme both the MOD and the PENTAGON had stuck up a specialist "road-blocker" to deny anything and everything that might be even remotely injurious to their departments. Both were adept and, I am glad to say, both WENT OVER THE TOP in their denials, they probably had to as they're seeking to defend the indefensible. Indeed the smug representative of the MOD actually went so far as to infer that veterans who claimed multiple vaccine injections in a single day were LIARS!. Outrageous of course - but doesn't it show the total bankruptcy of his position - no doubt he claims to be "Ethical"!. If you can manage, as the Ministry of Defence has, to poison an entire Army of 36,000 fighting men - committing in fact a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY - then seek to suggest it was the troops own fault for "agreeing" to be vaccinated - there can be only one answer to the putrid corruption that surrounds the whole fetid business, and that is a - PUBLIC JUDICIAL REVIEW - NOTHING ELSE WILL EVEN REMOTELY SUFFICE! NEWS FLASH: It has since been reported that only 27% of Armed Forces personnel have accepted the latest attempt to vaccinate them against ANTHRAX!. Despite desperate attempts by the MOD to convince troops this was a safe procedure - THEY SIMPLY DIDN'T BELIEVE THEM - they considered the threat of Saddam Hussein's chemical warfare was not as great as the dangers of accepting the MOD's "Chemical Warfare Protection!. Who can blame them after thousands of Gulf War Veterans have had their health wrecked - then been sneered at and treated with contempt by the MOD "Fat Bottoms" who've never got within a thousand miles of a battle field. Out of 2,500 men aboard the carriers "Invincible" and "Illustrious" ONLY 2 MEN, accepted the MOD's out-of-date gunge - which - according to law - should have been destroyed 5 years ago! Michael D.Taylor, Cdr. RN.,Ret'd., Executive Director (DPV). |
|
CLICK BELOW FOR MY TRIBES PAGE ( TOP ONLINE GAMEING). |
